On Mar 31, 2010, at 6:03 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Brice Goglin, le Wed 31 Mar 2010 11:37:17 +0200, a écrit :
> > We might need to replace some occurences of "logical processor" in the
> > doc with "processing unit". Or use both from time to time to make it
> > clear that it's very similar (and explain the difference somewhere).
> I'd say keep it in the glossary section of the documentation, to make it
> clear that by PU we mean "logical processor", and not "core".
Perfect. Let's do it.
For corporate legal information go to: