Jeff Squyres, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 17:05:39 -0400, a écrit :
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word should be no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange topologies out there that would take up more space...? (it certainly would in the graphic output...)
> > The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that
> > returns P, yes, else the output is very large.
> How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the graphic output?
> Shorten "processor" to:
That's still very large. We are going toward dozens of cores on each
sockets, we really need to keep them small :)