On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 22:05, Jeff Squyres <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> > Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? Â At least on my machine, the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word should be no problem. Â But I don't know if there are other strange topologies out there that would take up more space...? Â (it certainly would in the graphic output...)
>>
>> The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that
>> returns P, yes, else the output is very large.
>
> How about "Processor" in the text outputs, and a shorter version in the graphic output?
>
> Shorten "processor" to:
>
> Prcssr
> Prcsr
> Procr
> Procsr
> ...?
For htop I use just "CPU".
Bert
|