Jeff Squyres, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 14:15:50 -0400, a écrit :
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > > I like "Proc" instead of "P" even for the non-v output. :-)
> > I am not against it, but I don't remember the reason for the initial
> > change. Maybe because "processor" is confusing for some people (logical
> > vs physical socket) ?
> Oh crap. I think you're right. And I think I even asked for that. ;-)
> Is it a crime to use the full word "Processor"? At least on my machine, the output width is still far less than 80 characters, so the full word should be no problem. But I don't know if there are other strange topologies out there that would take up more space...? (it certainly would in the graphic output...)
The graphical output is a reason to at least have a function that
returns P, yes, else the output is very large.