Brice Goglin, le Mon 22 Mar 2010 11:43:10 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit :
> >> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so
> >> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the
> >> alloc/free frequency.
> > This is indeed better (and actually reduces the amount of code in
> > hwloc), I have implemented it.
> Should we also convert some other functions that previously returned a
> newly allocated cpuset ? For instance hwloc_cpuset_from_string and some
> helpers in the glibc/libnuma/openfabrics headers
Mmm, I'd tend to say so. They were already exposed previously, but at
least adding a parameter will not go unnoticed.