On Feb 28, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> $ utils/lstopo -
> Machine(1509MB) + Socket l#0 + L2 l#0(2048KB)
> L1 l#0(32KB) + Core l#0 + P l#0
> L1 l#1(32KB) + Core l#1 + P l#1
> $ utils/lstopo - -p
> Machine(1509MB) + Socket p#0 + L2(2048KB)
> L1(32KB) + Core p#0 + P p#0
> L1(32KB) + Core p#1 + P p#1
Just curious -- what happened to the #0 for the L1 and L2 cache in the physical display, above?
> $ utils/lstopo - -l
> Machine(1509MB) + Socket#0l + L2#0l(2048KB)
> L1#0l(32KB) + Core#0l + P#0l
> L1#1l(32KB) + Core#1l + P#1l
> $ utils/lstopo - -p
> Machine(1509MB) + Socket#0p + L2(2048KB)
> L1(32KB) + Core#0p + P#0p
> L1(32KB) + Core#1p + P#1p
Same question as above.
> I think I prefer the latter.
I marginally prefer the former, but don't have a strong opinion -- I can't think of any better option than these two.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}