I wouldn't say no to the ability to flatten Misc / NUMA. As to the
current issue though, does my patch look acceptable? Thanks.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:54:43 +0100, a écrit :
>> Introduce several numagroup types? How many? That's not easy to
> Or maybe we can add an "ignore" configuration function that also takes a
> pair of depth parameters to ignore a range of depths for a given type.
> Here you would ignore the NUMA level and the NUMAGROUP depths different
> from the one you're interested in, and this also permits to e.g. ignore
> the L1 and L2 caches but not the L3 cache, etc.
> hwloc-devel mailing list
Michael A. Raymond
Message Passing Toolkit Team
Silicon Graphics Inc