On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > The *only* weird possibility would be if RH (or Suse) patched their
> > old glibcs to fix this problem but didn't update the minor number.
> Ok but in that case we'd just use the PLPA implementation that should
> work fine. On the long run RH/Suse will eventually really upgrade
> glibc and get the bumped minor.