Open MPI logo

Hardware Locality Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1255
From: Samuel Thibault (samuel.thibault_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-29 07:38:43


sthibaul_at_[hidden], le Thu 29 Oct 2009 07:33:39 -0400, a écrit :
> + * \note Depending on OSes and implementations, strict binding
> + * may not be possible (implementation reason) or not allowed
> + * (administrative reasons), and the function will fail in that case.

I'm just wondering: maybe by default hwloc should try strict binding
and if it fails, if the strict flag is set, error out, else revert to
non-strict binding. That way only people who really want absolute strict
binding and fail if it is not available will use the hwloc strict flag.

Samuel