Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 10:36:33 -0500, a écrit :
> On 10/21/2009 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Pavan Balaji, le Wed 21 Oct 2009 09:55:36 -0500, a écrit :
> >> 1. I see a AC_PROG_CC_C99 in the configure.ac. Do you require the
> >> compiler to be C99 capable always?
> > No, we ended up using constructs which should pass c90 and the compilers
> > we have tested (aix, solaris, icc).
> So shouldn't the AC_PROG_CC_C99 be gotten rid of?
No because when C99 is available, we enable some optimization features,