Fawzi Mohamed, le Wed 30 Sep 2009 10:10:47 +0200, a écrit :
> If you look at the example described in the document that I had linked
> you see the that for a ring topology some level (that you always get adding the
Yes, we could also provide this as an additional structure.
> For a the ring topology a-b-c-d-a is difficult to find a good partition... and
> having both partition and non partition views (one used for resource allocation
> /distribution, the other for resource finding/stealing), is quite clean imho.
Yes, heuristics would partition it into ((a,b),(c,d)), while
non-partition could usefully provide all the related triplets. We can