On 30-set-09, at 10:38, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
>> NODE 1
>> cache2
>> cache1
>> p0
>> cache2
>> cache1
>> p1
>> NODE 2
>> cache1
>> p2
>> cache1
>> p3
>>
>> or is it even possible to have a node with children of a single node
>> of different depth?
>>
>> this is supposing that you want to keep that a level has a single
>> type
>> (and given the api I suppose it is so).
>
> We keep same caches in the same level. So node 2 has children at
> depth+2
> instead of depth+1.
thanks Brice, that is what I wanted to know.
ciao
Fawzi
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}