Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
> NODE 1
> cache2
> cache1
> p0
> cache2
> cache1
> p1
> NODE 2
> cache1
> p2
> cache1
> p3
>
> or is it even possible to have a node with children of a single node
> of different depth?
>
> this is supposing that you want to keep that a level has a single type
> (and given the api I suppose it is so).
We keep same caches in the same level. So node 2 has children at depth+2
instead of depth+1.
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}