Intel V11.1.080$ icc -vVersion 11.1#define __ICC 1110#define __INTEL_COMPILER 1110#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20101201Intel V2011.3.174$ icc -vVersion 12.0.3#define __ICC 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20110309Intel V2011.4.191$ icc -vVersion 12.0.4#define __ICC 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20110427Intel V2011.5.220$ icc -vVersion 12.0.5#define __ICC 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER 1200#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20110719Intel V2011.6.233$ icc -vicc version 12.1.0 (gcc version 4.1.2 compatibility)#define __ICC 9999#define __INTEL_COMPILER 9999#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20110811
I posted my findings about the bad version no. macros to the same thread that described the Intel V12.1 optimizer bug (http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=87132). The response I got is:_______________________________________________Posted By: Hubert Haberstock (Intel)
__________________________________________
The build date is currently the only suitable macro. This allows to check for the Intel Compiler and for specific compiler versions. Makes sense? Regards, Hubert.
__________________________________________That is contrary to what the online V12.1 documentation says. I'm going to find out what the previous versions do, then report this through my normal support channels. If the documentation is wrong, they should fix it; if the documentation is right, they should fix the compiler. (However, there will still be an errant V12.1.0 that reports itself as 9999, so use of the version no. macros will never be reliable without a hack to handle this errant case.) I'll report here what I find about the values of the version no. macros. It is probably better, though, that automake/libtool rely on the output of icc -v, since that seems to always result in a value that matches the version of the product (as opposed to #define __INTEL_COMPILER 9999 and #define __ICC 9999 from within the V12.1.0 compiler).On 19 Oct 2011, at 10:47 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:Did this get reported to the Intel compiler support people?
On Oct 19, 2011, at 8:24 AM, George Bosilca wrote:Thanks Larry,Will forward this info upstream.george.On Oct 18, 2011, at 21:56 , Larry Baker wrote:George,Thanks for the update. FYI, here's all the version numbers reported by the compiler releases I have installed:[baker@hydra ~]$ module load compilers/intel/11.1.080[baker@hydra ~]$ icc -vVersion 11.1[baker@hydra ~]$ module unload compilers/intel/11.1.080[baker@hydra ~]$ module load compilers/intel/2011.3.174[baker@hydra ~]$ icc -vVersion 12.0.3[baker@hydra ~]$ module unload compilers/intel/2011.3.174[baker@hydra ~]$ module load compilers/intel/2011.4.191[baker@hydra ~]$ icc -vVersion 12.0.4[baker@hydra ~]$ module unload compilers/intel/2011.4.191[baker@hydra ~]$ module load compilers/intel/2011.5.220[baker@hydra ~]$ icc -vVersion 12.0.5[baker@hydra ~]$ module unload compilers/intel/2011.5.220[baker@hydra ~]$ module load compilers/intel/2011.6.233[baker@hydra ~]$ icc -vicc version 12.1.0 (gcc version 4.1.2 compatibility)[baker@hydra ~]$ module unload compilers/intel/2011.6.233Another problem I found with the Intel 12.1.0 compiler: I started to look at adding a test for the Intel compiler version around the #pragma that disables optimization for OpenMPI and I found the __ICC and __INTEL_COMPILER predefined macros (compiler version no.) are not properly defined:$ icc -E -dD hello.c | grep __INTEL_COMPILER#define __INTEL_COMPILER 9999#define __INTEL_COMPILER_BUILD_DATE 20110811$ icc -E -dD hello.c | grep __ICC#define __ICC 9999$ icc -vicc version 12.1.0 (gcc version 4.1.2 compatibility)I do not know if there is code in OpenMPI that looks at __ICC and __INTEL_COMPILER, but that could cause problems. (Pass this on upstream to the libtool people?)Larry BakerUS Geological Survey650-329-5608baker@usgs.govOn 17 Oct 2011, at 8:18 PM, George Bosilca wrote:Larry,Sorry for not updating this thread. The issue was identified and fixed by Rainer in r25290 (https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/25290). Please read the comments and the linked thread on the Intel forum for more info about.I couldn't find a trace of this being fixed in the 1.4 series, so I would wait upgrading until this issue gets resolved.Thanks,george.On Oct 17, 2011, at 23:00 , Larry Baker wrote:George,I have not had time to look over the 1.4.3 make check failure for Intel 2011.6.233 compilers. Have you?I had planned to get 1.4.3 compiled on all six of our compilers using the latest compiler releases. I was putting off upgrading to 1.4.4 or 1.5.x until after that to minimize the number of things that could go wrong. Do you recommend otherwise?Larry BakerUS Geological Survey650-329-5608baker@usgs.govOn 7 Oct 2011, at 6:46 PM, George Bosilca wrote:The may_alias attribute was part of a forward-looking attribute checking, at a time where few compiler supported them. This explains why they are not widely used in the library itself. Moreover, as they do not affect the compilation itself (as your test highlights this is not the issue with the icc 2011.6.233 compiler), there is no urge to remove the may_alias support.I just got that particular version of the compiler installed on one of our machines. I'll give it a try over the weekend.george.On Oct 7, 2011, at 20:21 , Larry Baker wrote:The test for the __may_alias_ attribute uses the following short code snippet:int * p_value __attribute__ ((__may_alias__));intmain (){;return 0;}Indeed, for Intel 2011 compilers prior to 2011.6.233, this results in a warning:root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# module load compilers/intel/2011.5.220[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# icc -c may_alias_test.cmay_alias_test.c(123): warning #1292: attribute "__may_alias__" ignoredint * p_value __attribute__ ((__may_alias__));^[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# module unload compilers/intel/2011.5.220[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# module load compilers/intel/2011.6.233[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# icc -c may_alias_test.cI modified ./configure to forceompi_cv___attribute__may_alias=0Then I compiled and tested the library. Unfortunately, the results were exactly the same:make check-TESTSmake[3]: Entering directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test/datatype'/bin/sh: line 4: 26326 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tstFAIL: checksum/bin/sh: line 4: 26359 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tstFAIL: position========================================================2 of 2 tests failedPlease report to http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/========================================================I could not find any use of the may_alias attribute, other than in a #define in opal/include/opal_config_bottom.h. Is OMPI_HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_MAY_ALIAS just cruft that can be removed?Larry BakerUS Geological Survey650-329-5608baker@usgs.govOn 7 Oct 2011, at 11:08 AM, Larry Baker wrote:I ran into a problem this past week trying to upgrade our OpenMPI 1.4.3 for the latest Intel 2011 compiler, 2011.6.233.make check fails with Segmentation Fault errors:[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# tail -20 ../openmpi-1.4.3-check-intel.6.233.log/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link icc -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -finline-functions -fno-strict-aliasing -restrict -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -shared-intel -export-dynamic -shared-intel -o ddt_pack ddt_pack.o ../../ompi/libmpi.la -lnsl -lutillibtool: link: icc -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -finline-functions -fno-strict-aliasing -restrict -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -shared-intel -shared-intel -o .libs/ddt_pack ddt_pack.o -Wl,--export-dynamic ../../ompi/.libs/libmpi.so /usr/local/src/openmpi-1.4.3/orte/.libs/libopen-rte.so /usr/local/src/openmpi-1.4.3/opal/.libs/libopen-pal.so -ldl -lnsl -lutil -pthread -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/libmake[3]: Leaving directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test/datatype'make check-TESTSmake[3]: Entering directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test/datatype'/bin/sh: line 4: 6322 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tstFAIL: checksum/bin/sh: line 4: 6355 Segmentation fault ${dir}$tstFAIL: position========================================================2 of 2 tests failedPlease report to http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/========================================================make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1make[3]: Leaving directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test/datatype'make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2make[2]: Leaving directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test/datatype'make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1make[1]: Leaving directory `/state/partition1/root/src/openmpi-1.4.3/test'make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1Before trying to track down the problem, I thought I'd describe what I see here in case someone recognizes what might be happening.We have been using OpenMPI 1.4.3 compiled with the Intel 2011.3.174 compiler. I've updated the Intel 2011 compilers as they have come out with new versions: 2011.4.191, 2011.5.220, and now 2011.6.233. However, I've not recompiled OpenMPI 1.4.3 until now.Since the original compilation of OpenMPI 1.4.3 with the Intel 2011.3.174 compilers, I have installed libnuma and libnuma-devel RPMs on our cluster front end. I noticed that changed the OpenMPI 1.4.3 ./configure output. To test that this was not the cause of the problem, I recompiled OpenMPI 1.4.3 using both the CentOS/Rocks GNU compilers and the Intel 2011.3.174 compilers. They both passed all the make check tests.To find out when this problem first occurs, I systematically configured, compiled, and checked OpenMPI 1.4.3 with all four versions of the Intel 2011 compilers we have. We use the modules package to load the compiler environment:[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# env | grep /opt/intelLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.6.233/compiler/lib/intel64:/opt/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.6.233/mkl/lib/intel64PATH=/opt/intel/composer_xe_2011_sp1.6.233/bin/intel64:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/java/latest/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/opt/eclipse:/opt/ganglia/bin:/opt/ganglia/sbin:/opt/maui/bin:/opt/torque/bin:/opt/torque/sbin:/opt/rocks/bin:/opt/rocks/sbin:/root/binHere's the steps I use to make and test OpenMPI 1.4.3 (I use a patched version to accommodate the six compilers we have; I've submitted those patches here in the past):# cd /usr/local/src# tar -xjf openmpi-1.4.3-patched.tar.bz2# cd openmpi-1.4.3# module load compilers/intel/2011.6.233# ./configure >../openmpi-1.4.3-configure-intel.6.233.log 2>&1 --with-tm --with-openib --without-valgrind --without-udapl --enable-contrib-no-build=vt --with-wrapper-ldflags="-shared-intel" CC="icc" CFLAGS="-g -O3" CXX="icpc" CXXFLAGS="-g -O3" FC="ifort" FCFLAGS="-g -O3" F77="ifort" FFLAGS="-g -O3" LDFLAGS="-shared-intel"# make >../openmpi-1.4.3-make-intel.6.233.log 2>&1# make check >../openmpi-1.4.3-check-intel.6.233.log 2>&1(When I generate the OpenMPI 1.4.3 library we actually use, I also add a --prefix. But, that complicates diff's of the stdout files for these steps, so it is not used here. Thus, I do NOT proceed to make install any of these libraries.)The three earlier versions of the Intel 2011 compilers all pass the make check tests. When I compare the ./configure stdout files, they are all identical. However, the ./configure stdout file for the Intel 2011.6.233 compilers has one difference:[root@hydra openmpi-1.4.3]# diff ../openmpi-1.4.3-configure-intel.{5.220,6.233}.log178c178< checking for __attribute__(may_alias)... no---checking for __attribute__(may_alias)... yesThat is obviously where I will start looking for the source of the problem.Maybe someone reading this list knows what the purpose of that test is, whether the Intel 2011 compilers are expected to have this feature enabled, and whether the code this enables can cause this problem if the Intel 2011.6.233 compilers do not fully support whatever this test is intended to discern.Larry BakerUS Geological Survey650-329-5608baker@usgs.gov_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________devel mailing listdevel@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel