Yes, after the release is a break. I'm sending now all my output, maybe that helps more. But the code is basically the one i sent. The normal execution reaches to the send/receive between the orted_comm and the receiver.Best regards.Hugo<output1>_______________________________________________2011/3/8 Ralph Castain <rhc@open-mpi.org>
The comm can most certainly be done - there are other sections of that code that also send messages. I can't see the end of your new code section, but I assume you ended it properly with a "break"? Otherwise, you'll execute whatever lies below it as well.On Mar 8, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Hugo Meyer wrote:Yes, i set the value 31 and it is not duplicated._______________________________________________2011/3/8 Ralph Castain <rhc@open-mpi.org>What value did you set for this new command? Did you look at the cmds in orte/mca/odls/odls_types.h to ensure you weren't using a duplicate value?On Mar 8, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Hugo Meyer wrote:_______________________________________________Hello @ll.I've got a problem in a communication between the v_protocol_receiver_component.c and the orted_comm.c.In the mca_vprotocol_receiver_component_init i've added a request that is received correctly by the orte_daemon_process_commands but when i try to reply to the sender i get the next error:[clus1:15593] [ 0] /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x2aaaabb03d40][clus1:15593] [ 1] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0 [0x2aaaaad760db][clus1:15593] [ 2] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0 [0x2aaaaad75aa4][clus1:15593] [ 3] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/openmpi/mca_errmgr_orted.so [0x2aaaae2d2fdd][clus1:15593] [ 4] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(orte_odls_base_notify_iof_complete+0x1da) [0x2aaaaad42cb0][clus1:15593] [ 5] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(orte_daemon_process_commands+0x1068) [0x2aaaaad19ca6][clus1:15593] [ 6] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(orte_daemon_cmd_processor+0x81b) [0x2aaaaad18a55][clus1:15593] [ 7] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0 [0x2aaaaad9710e][clus1:15593] [ 8] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0 [0x2aaaaad974bb][clus1:15593] [ 9] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(opal_event_loop+0x1a) [0x2aaaaad972ad][clus1:15593] [10] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(opal_event_dispatch+0xe) [0x2aaaaad97166][clus1:15593] [11] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/lib/libopen-rte.so.0(orte_daemon+0x2322) [0x2aaaaad17556][clus1:15593] [12] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/bin/orted [0x4008a3][clus1:15593] [13] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x2aaaabd2d8a4][clus1:15593] [14] /home/hmeyer/desarrollo/radic-ompi/binarios/bin/orted [0x400799][clus1:15593] *** End of error message ***The code that i've added at the v_protocol_receiver_component.c is (in bold the recv command that fails):
int mca_vprotocol_receiver_request_protector(void) {orte_daemon_cmd_flag_t command;opal_buffer_t *buffer = NULL;int n = 1;command = ORTE_DAEMON_REQUEST_PROTECTOR_CMD;buffer = OBJ_NEW(opal_buffer_t);opal_dss.pack(buffer, &command, 1, ORTE_DAEMON_CMD);orte_rml.send_buffer(ORTE_PROC_MY_DAEMON, buffer, ORTE_RML_TAG_DAEMON, 0);orte_rml.recv_buffer(ORTE_PROC_MY_DAEMON, buffer, ORTE_DAEMON_REQUEST_PROTECTOR_CMD, 0);opal_dss.unpack(buffer, &mca_vprotocol_receiver.protector.jobid, &n, OPAL_UINT32);opal_dss.unpack(buffer, &mca_vprotocol_receiver.protector.vpid, &n, OPAL_UINT32);orte_process_info.protector.jobid = mca_vprotocol_receiver.protector.jobid;orte_process_info.protector.vpid = mca_vprotocol_receiver.protector.vpid;OBJ_RELEASE(buffer);return OMPI_SUCCESS;
The code that i've added at the orted_comm.c is (in bold the send command that fails):case ORTE_DAEMON_REQUEST_PROTECTOR_CMD:if (orte_debug_daemons_flag) {opal_output(0, "%s orted_recv: received request protector from local proc %s",ORTE_NAME_PRINT(ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME), ORTE_NAME_PRINT(sender));}/* Define the protector */protector = (uint32_t)ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME->vpid + 1;if (protector >= (uint32_t)orte_process_info.num_procs) {protector = 0;}/* Pack the protector data */answer = OBJ_NEW(opal_buffer_t);if (ORTE_SUCCESS != (ret = opal_dss.pack(answer, &ORTE_PROC_MY_NAME->jobid, 1, OPAL_UINT32))) {ORTE_ERROR_LOG(ret);OBJ_RELEASE(answer);goto CLEANUP;}if (ORTE_SUCCESS != (ret = opal_dss.pack(answer, &protector, 1, OPAL_UINT32))) {ORTE_ERROR_LOG(ret);OBJ_RELEASE(answer);goto CLEANUP;}if (orte_debug_daemons_flag) {opal_output(0, "EL PROTECTOR ASIGNADO para %s ES: %d\n",ORTE_NAME_PRINT(sender), protector);}/* Send the protector data */if (0 > orte_rml.send_buffer(sender, answer, ORTE_DAEMON_REQUEST_PROTECTOR_CMD, 0)) {ORTE_ERROR_LOG(ORTE_ERR_COMM_FAILURE);ret = ORTE_ERR_COMM_FAILURE;OBJ_RELEASE(answer);goto CLEANUP;}OBJ_RELEASE(answer);I assume by testing that the error is in the bolded section, maybe because i'am missing some sentence when i try to communicate, or maybe this communication cannot be done. Any help will be appreciated.Thanks a lot.Hugo Meyer
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
devel mailing list
devel@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel