On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Bogdan Costescu <email@example.com>
Thanks for all your efforts ! I'm using the rankfile mapper as this is
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Ralph Castain <firstname.lastname@example.org
> Tracking this down has reminded me of all the reasons why I despise the rankfile mapper... :-/
the documented (in the FAQ) affinity-related one at least for the
stable series. If there's a better way which I've missed, I'd be eager
It depends on what you are trying to do. Rankfile is really only useful if you need to specify rank-by-rank precise bindings. Otherwise, you can specify bind-to-core or bind-to-socket to get a more general automatic binding pattern. You can also specify cores-per-task and get each process bound to the specified number of cores.
So there are a lot of options, including rankfile. Unfortunately, I see that these options are not documented on the FAQ or the wiki. :-/
Take a look at "man mpirun" and you'll see more info about all this in the part on process binding options.
I've applied to a 1.4.1 tree the patches from tickets #2318 and #2321
> I have created a fix for this mess and will submit it for inclusion in 1.4.
and I can confirm that both problems reported earlier are fixed.
Thanks - appreciate the confirmation!
No offense taken :-) I appreciate your efforts and I understand your
> Thanks - not your fault, so pardon the comments. Just had my fill of this particular code since the creators of it no longer support it.
frustration about unmaintaned code. Thanks again !