On Jan 27, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hjelmn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Nathan, I have no idea what you are talking about. What I do know is that you had me commit a patch to the trunk and v1.7.4 that caused multiple warnings about 32-bit issues to appear in both cases. George is reporting issues that look very much like the ones I'd expect based on those warnings.
> That patch for coll/ml was correct for 1.7.4 and no further action is
> required. The two crashed George reported are in 1) the new vader (not
> in 1.7.4), and 2) the coll/ml updates (also not in 1.7.4). Neither code
> path exists in 1.7.4.
My bad - I rechecked 1.7.4 and found the warnings indeed do not exist there.
>> Release of 1.7.4 is still waiting for the patch you promised me last week to fix these problems. I don't give a rats a$$ about SGI at this stage - I just want to get your patch that fixes 1.7.4 so we can release the stupid thing!!!
> That patch did not cause any warning on 1.7.4. Only the trunk because it
> conflicted with the update to coll/ml. That is not scheduled for 1.7.4
> so I am waiting on ORNL to make sure we do the right thing.
> As far as I am concerned 1.7.4 should be ready to go. Unless some new
> 32-bit issue cropped up with coll/ml. Since MTT is suggested we are fine
> with 32-bit I doubt that is the case.
Brian is doing one last 32-bit smoke check to be sure as none of the MTT tests are running in that mode, so far as I'm aware.
> devel mailing list