I actually noted this in the unofficial tarball you rolled for me in
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargrove_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm not sure why one is trying to build the usnic btl on Solaris at all.
> Perhaps just because the OFED stack is present?
I assumed your lack of response meant Cicso had some plans for Solaris
support that you could "neither confirm nor deny" ;)
Attached are the configure outputs and config.log from both the trunk and
1.7-latest on a 64-bit Solaris-11 system.
I can provide 32-bit if required, but the usnic BTL is built independent of
$ bzgrep 'usnic can compile' openmpi-*.bz2
MCA component btl:usnic can compile... yes
openmpi-trunk-solaris11-x64-ib-gcc452-configure.txt.bz2:checking if MCA
component btl:usnic can compile... yes
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> Paul --
> Could you send the configure stdout and config.log for your 32 bit build
> on Solaris?
> We have a test in the usnic BTL that is supposed to ensure that it only
> builds on Linux, but given some of the output you've sent, it looks like it
> is also building on Solaris... (which means our configure test is not
> filtering out Solaris).
> Jeff Squyres
> For corporate legal information go to:
> devel mailing list
Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove_at_[hidden]
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900