Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] portable_platform.h copies
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-06 09:44:28


I looked at that, too -- I think the only reason to have 2 files is that mpi_portable_platform.h is included by mpi.h (its used for knowing how to define __mpi_interface_deprecated__ in mpi.h), and is therefore installed. opal_portable_platform.h is not installed.

On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:40 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwbarre_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> All -
>
> Is there a reason we have both opal/include/opal_portable_platform.h and
> ompi/include/mpi_portable_platform.h? If they're always supposed to have
> the same content (which appears to be the case), then it seems like
> building mpi_portable_platform.h from opal_portable_platform.h at build
> time is a more appropriate path forward. I'll do the work, but wanted
> someone else to verify that I wasn't missing something.
>
> Brian
>
> --
> Brian W. Barrett
> Scalable System Software Group
> Sandia National Laboratories
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/