This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
I looked at that, too -- I think the only reason to have 2 files is that mpi_portable_platform.h is included by mpi.h (its used for knowing how to define __mpi_interface_deprecated__ in mpi.h), and is therefore installed. opal_portable_platform.h is not installed.
On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:40 AM, "Barrett, Brian W" <bwbarre_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> All -
> Is there a reason we have both opal/include/opal_portable_platform.h and
> ompi/include/mpi_portable_platform.h? If they're always supposed to have
> the same content (which appears to be the case), then it seems like
> building mpi_portable_platform.h from opal_portable_platform.h at build
> time is a more appropriate path forward. I'll do the work, but wanted
> someone else to verify that I wasn't missing something.
> Brian W. Barrett
> Scalable System Software Group
> Sandia National Laboratories
> devel mailing list
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/