Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: usnic BTL MPI_T pvar scheme
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-05 21:00:07


On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargrove_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> If this approach is to be adopted by other components (and perhaps other MPIs), then it would be important for the enumeration variable name to be derived in a UNIFORM way:
> <framework>_<component>_SOMETHING
> Without a fixed value for "SOMETHING" somebody will need to read sources (or documentation) to make the connection.

This is a good point; we got a similar piece of feedback from the MPI tools group.

How about naming the state variable "<framework>_<component>"? And then that will apply to all "<framework>_<component>*" pvars.

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/