Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: [OMPI devel] shmem vs. oshmem
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-25 12:33:01


We had a few emails a little while ago, and decided that the branding should be "oshmem" because Open SHMEM is different than (original) SHMEM.

I notice that there's still:

- shmemcc / shmemfort / shmem_info / shmemrun
  --> should these all be "oshmem*" ?

- the examples are hello_shmem* and ring_shmem*
  --> should these all be "*_oshmem*" ?

- there are header files named shmem*
  --> I'm guessing the names "shmem.h" and "shmem.fh" are mandated
  --> shmem_portable_platform.h.in should probably be oshmem_portable_platform.h.in, right?
  --> same for the internal headers shmem_api_logger.h and shmem_lock.h

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/