Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] oshmem Fortran
From: Ralph Castain (rhc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 10:17:14


Then I would suggest you stick with "oshmem" to be clear you mean OpenSHMEM

On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Igor Ivanov <igor.ivanov_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> As I know OpenSHMEM is an effort to create a standardized SHMEM library for C and Fortran. SGI’s SHMEM API is the baseline for OpenSHMEM Specification 1.0.
> Most of OpenSHMEM API functions can be found in different SHMEM API implementations but there are functions that are specific for SGI`s, Cray`s etc products.
>
> SIte www.shmem.org says that "The SHMEM™ Application Programming Interface (API) definition and the SHMEM trademark are the property of SGI. "
>
> Igor
>
> On 18.10.2013 16:33, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Igor Ivanov <igor.ivanov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there naming convention related configure options in OMPI?
>>> Do you see any objections about --enable-oshmem-xxx or they must be replaced with --enable-shmem-xxx?
>> Hmm. Good question.
>>
>> I don't know enough about shmem vs. open shmem to say. Is the API the same? If the API is the same, then you make a good point -- perhaps we should replace all --with-oshmem-xxx and --enable-oshmem-xxx with --with-shmem-xxx and --enable-shmem-xxx, respectively.
>>
>> Supporting this view, we have several --with-mpi-xxx switches (i.e., we don't have --with-ompi-xxx switches). But this works because Open MPI is just an implementation of MPI. Forgive my shmem ignorance: is the oshmem/ layer an implementation of Shmem? Or an implementation of Open Shmem? (is there a difference between the two?)
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel