Then I would suggest you stick with "oshmem" to be clear you mean OpenSHMEM
On Oct 18, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Igor Ivanov <igor.ivanov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> As I know OpenSHMEM is an effort to create a standardized SHMEM library for C and Fortran. SGIs SHMEM API is the baseline for OpenSHMEM Specification 1.0.
> Most of OpenSHMEM API functions can be found in different SHMEM API implementations but there are functions that are specific for SGI`s, Cray`s etc products.
> SIte www.shmem.org says that "The SHMEM Application Programming Interface (API) definition and the SHMEM trademark are the property of SGI. "
> On 18.10.2013 16:33, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> On Oct 18, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Igor Ivanov <igor.ivanov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Is there naming convention related configure options in OMPI?
>>> Do you see any objections about --enable-oshmem-xxx or they must be replaced with --enable-shmem-xxx?
>> Hmm. Good question.
>> I don't know enough about shmem vs. open shmem to say. Is the API the same? If the API is the same, then you make a good point -- perhaps we should replace all --with-oshmem-xxx and --enable-oshmem-xxx with --with-shmem-xxx and --enable-shmem-xxx, respectively.
>> Supporting this view, we have several --with-mpi-xxx switches (i.e., we don't have --with-ompi-xxx switches). But this works because Open MPI is just an implementation of MPI. Forgive my shmem ignorance: is the oshmem/ layer an implementation of Shmem? Or an implementation of Open Shmem? (is there a difference between the two?)
> devel mailing list