-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 23/07/13 19:34, Joshua Ladd wrote:
> The proposed solution that "we" (OMPI + SLURM) have come up with
> is to modify OMPI to support PMI2 and to use SLURM 2.6 which has
> support for PMI2 and is (allegedly) much more scalable than PMI1.
> Several folks in the combined communities are working hard, as we
> speak, trying to get this functional to see if it indeed makes a
> difference. Stay tuned, Chris. Hopefully we will have some data by
> the end of the week.
Is there any news on this?
We'd love to be able to test this out if we can as I currently see a
60% penalty with srun with my test NAMD job from our tame MM person.
Christopher Samuel Senior Systems Administrator
VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
Email: samuel_at_[hidden] Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----