On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Piotr Lesnicki <piotr.lesnicki_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 1) you are right, an eof in the middle of a <comment> section must be
> handled explicitly, otherwise it ends by an unrelated error later,
> just as it currently does. By the way, here it ends with
> [no-options-error] which has no corresponding message in
> I joined the patch to correct this <comment> problem.
Sweet. Sounds like this was a long-standing problem.
> 2) indeed, other lex files have similar patterns to 'keyval_lex.l', so
> we should correct them also. I will take a look at them.
Can you submit a combined patch when ready?
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/