Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] MPI-2.2 status #2223, #3127
From: Kawashima, Takahiro (t-kawashima_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-20 20:41:19


Jeff, George,

Thanks for your replies. I'll notify my colleagues of these mails.
Please tell me (or write on the ticket) which repo to use for topo
after you take a look.

Regards,
Takahiro Kawashima,
MPI development team,
Fujitsu

> Long story short. It is freshly forked from the OMPI trunk, patched with topi-fixes (and not topo-fixes-fixed for some reason). Don't whack them yet, let me take a look more in details.
>
> George.
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2013, at 17:10 , "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Ok. If it contains everything you put on the original topo-fixes (and topo-fixes-fixed), I might as well kill those two repos and put your repo URL on the ticket.
> >
> > So -- before I whack those two -- can you absolutely confirm that you've got everything from the topo-fixes-fixed repo? IIRC, there was some other fixes/updates to the topo base in there, not just the new dist_graph improvements.
> >
> >
> > On Jan 18, 2013, at 11:06 AM, George Bosilca <bosilca_at_[hidden]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's a fork from the official ompi (well the hg version of it). We will push back once we're done.
> >>
> >> George.
> >>
> >> On Jan 18, 2013, at 15:42 , "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> George --
> >>>
> >>> Should I pull from your repo into https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes-fixed? Or did you effectively fork, and you guys will put back to SVN when you're done?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:47 AM, George Bosilca <bosilca_at_[hidden]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Takahiro,
> >>>>
> >>>> The MPI_Dist_graph effort is happening in ssh://hg@bitbucket.org/bosilca/ompi-topo. I would definitely be interested in seeing some test cases, and giving this branch a tough test.
> >>>>
> >>>> George.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 18, 2013, at 02:43 , "Kawashima, Takahiro" <t-kawashima_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fujitsu is interested in completing MPI-2.2 on Open MPI and Open MPI
> >>>>> -based Fujitsu MPI.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We've read wiki and tickets. These two tickets seem to be almost done
> >>>>> but need testing and bug fixing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2223
> >>>>> MPI-2.2: MPI_Dist_graph_* functions missing
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/3127
> >>>>> MPI-2.2: Add reduction support for MPI_C_*COMPLEX and MPI::*COMPLEX
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My colleagues are planning to work on these. They will write test codes
> >>>>> and try to fix bugs. Test codes and patches can be contributed to the
> >>>>> community. If they cannot fix some bugs, we will report details. They
> >>>>> are planning to complete them in around March.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With that two questions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The latest statuses written in these ticket comments are correct?
> >>>>> Is there any more progress?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where are the latest codes?
> >>>>> In ticket #2223 says it is on Jeff's ompi-topo-fixes bitbucket branch.
> >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes
> >>>>> But Jeff seems to have one more branch with a similar name.
> >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-topo-fixes-fixed
> >>>>> Ticket #3127 says it is on Jeff's mpi22-c-complex bitbucket branch.
> >>>>> But there is no such branch now.
> >>>>> https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/mpi22-c-complex