On Dec 3, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Hjelm, Nathan T wrote:
> Oh, and I don't know if you have tried this but we don't recreate the keyval_lex.c file if it already exists. This allows use to not put a flex requirement on the end user.
Why? Shouldn't we have a proper .l.c rule in the Makefile.am?
Does that somehow cause tarball builds to invoke flex? And if so, should we put the .l.c rule in an automake conditional something like:
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/