Dear all,
There are some collective communications with the possibility of terminating abnormally when MPI_IN_PLACE is specified.
(MPI_Allgather/MPI_Allgatherv/MPI_Gather/MPI_Scatter)
They refer to sdtype or rdtype (For MPI_Scatter) unconditionally by the consideration leakage of the MPI standard at MPI_IN_PLACE.
It terminates abnormally when NULL is specified for a data type of the sending side or receiving side with which MPI_IN_PLACE is specifiable.
e.g.) MPI_Allgather(MPI_IN_PLACE, scount, NULL, rbuf, rcount, recvdtype, ...);
- Functions which have this MPI_IN_PLACE problem:
Which data type: The sending side data type
It terminates abnormally when sdtype=NULL is specified at sbuf=MPI_IN_PLACE.
(sdtype must be ignored when sbuf = MPI_IN_PLACE.)
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_dec_fixed
ompi_coll_tuned_allgatherv_intra_dec_fixed
MPI_Gather
ompi_coll_tuned_gather_intra_binomial
MPI_Allgather
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_bruck
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_recursivedoubling
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_ring
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_neighborexchange
ompi_coll_tuned_allgather_intra_two_procs
MPI_Allgatherv
ompi_coll_tuned_allgatherv_intra_bruck
ompi_coll_tuned_allgatherv_intra_ring
ompi_coll_tuned_allgatherv_intra_neighborexchange
ompi_coll_tuned_allgatherv_intra_two_procs
Which data type: The receiving side data type
It terminates abnormally when rdtype=NULL is specified at rbuf=MPI_IN_PLACE.
("rdtype" must be ignored when rbuf = MPI_IN_PLACE.)
MPI_Scatter
ompi_coll_tuned_scatter_intra_binomial
We attach a patch.
Best Regards,
Yuki Matsumoto,
MPI development team,
Fujitsu
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}