On Sep 12, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Sounds like that should resolve my failure - I'll try to verify from a nightly tarball when I have the opportunity.
Thanks! I'll probably make another RC this afternoon, because we're really closing in on it.
> The fix I had in mind would have been to parse the mounts with sufficient intelligence to match a bind-mount to the original mount and determine it's type.
> I suppose that is still possible if one gets ambitious.
I am not that ambitious. :-)
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/