Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r27178 - trunk/ompi/mca/coll/ml
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-29 12:13:04


(+1 -- was wondering the same thing...)

On Aug 29, 2012, at 12:05 PM, George Bosilca wrote:

> I don't want to spark the pro/cons debate about inline, I just wonder if there is any tangible proof that forcing functions with hundreds/tens of lines of code to be inlined is of any benefit?
>
> george.
>
> On Aug 29, 2012, at 16:10 , svn-commit-mailer_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
>> Author: pasha (Pavel Shamis)
>> Date: 2012-08-29 10:10:42 EDT (Wed, 29 Aug 2012)
>> New Revision: 27178
>> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/27178
>>
>> Log:
>> Fixing ML COLL compilation issues on some SUN platforms. For more detail see following mail thread:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2012/08/11448.php
>> A lot of thanks to Paul Hargrove for the issue analysis and patch testing.
>> Refs #3243
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/