On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 07:16:00AM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Yeah, even if someone volunteered to do the conversion work, we wouldn't get agreement on making such a change. Some of us hate git (myself included), some feel similarly about mercurial, etc.
> Unfortunately, we've seen enough pain from git+svn to definitely not want to go that route.
Personally I have had no problems with git svn. In fact every commit I have made in the last 6 months has been with git svn dcommit. Any issues have been user error as I have to push/pull from my cluser tree (which gets out of sync a lot-- can't update it easily from off-site).