On May 23, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> It shouldn't be before AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, that's just busted and needs to
> be fixed in hwloc...
I don't think that's right. It's an AC macro, not an AM macro, so it can come before AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
Here's what happens if you put it before AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE:
----
[21:49] jsquyres-mac:~/tmp/foo % cat configure.ac
AC_INIT([bogus], [1.0], [http://example.com], [bogus])
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(./config)
AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR(./config)
AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([1.10 foreign -Wall -Werror])
AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile])
AC_OUTPUT
[21:49] jsquyres-mac:~/tmp/foo % autoreconf -ivf && ./configure
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
....it works fine
-----
But if you flip CANONICAL_TARGET / INIT_AUTOMAKE:
-----
[21:50] jsquyres-mac:~/tmp/foo % autoreconf -ivf && ./configure
autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal --force
configure.ac:6: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM was called before AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1834: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is expanded from...
configure.ac:6: the top level
autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing
configure.ac:6: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM was called before AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1834: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is expanded from...
configure.ac:6: the top level
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool
autoreconf: running: /opt/local/bin/autoconf --force
configure.ac:6: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM was called before AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1834: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is expanded from...
configure.ac:6: the top level
autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Autoheader
autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --force-missing
configure.ac:6: warning: AC_ARG_PROGRAM was called before AC_CANONICAL_TARGET
../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1834: AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is expanded from...
configure.ac:6: the top level
autoreconf: Leaving directory `.'
.........etc.
-----
configure does seem to run ok, but I didn't include any other tests (like AC_PROG_CC), etc. I have a dim recollection that other things would break, but am too tired to test that right now.
> Brian
>
> On 5/23/12 3:23 PM, "Jeff Squyres" <jsquyres_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Yea, the CANONICAL_HOST thing is because of hwloc; sorry... It needs to
>> be very, very early in configure.ac. So getting the ordering wrong there
>> was probably my fault; sorry.
>>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, okay - didn't realize that ordering. I'll fix it - thanks!
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not sure what you mean; the file's loaded in OMPI_LOAD_PLATFORM, at
>>>> which
>>>> point all the contents of the file are evaluated as environment
>>>> variables.
>>>> The real problem is that someone really screwed up configure somewhere
>>>> along the way and called AC_CONONICAL_HOST before AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE,
>>>> which
>>>> means AC_PROG_GCC got evaluated really early, before
>>>> OMPI_LOAD_PLATFORM is
>>>> evaluated. It really needs to be evaluated before any non-init macros.
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> On 5/23/12 2:44 PM, "Ralph Castain" <rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking at it...
>>>>>
>>>>> We pickup the file at the right place, but we don't pull any of the
>>>>> flags
>>>>> out of it until later. I'm trying to see if I can adjust it.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: none of this changed from the 1.5 series, so this has been the
>>>>> situation for a very long time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup, it sucks. But that's not supported functionality. Someone
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> possibly desire to support it, but I could never get behavior I was
>>>>>> comfortable with, so I'm not making promises that should work. The
>>>>>> platform thing is a real hack to begin with in terms of what it does
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> autoconf...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/23/12 2:37 PM, "Gunter, David O" <dog_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So perhaps I should stop calling them environment variables. Since
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> can always do something like
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> $ ./configure CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/specialK" ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a line such as
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/specialK"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> should be supported by the platform file reader. No two systems are
>>>>>>> alike here and we need these platform files to manage the dozens of
>>>>>>> different OMPI builds. We have different paths for the IB libs,
>>>>>>> Panasas
>>>>>>> file system libs and includes, etc. Essentially, we're not going to
>>>>>>> 1.6
>>>>>>> at the moment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> David Gunter
>>>>>>> HPC-3: Infrastructure Team
>>>>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> David -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where exactly the platform file gets evaluated depends on a number
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> things that the OMPI developers don't have a lot of control over.
>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> never meant to be used to set environment variables, only command
>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>> arguments. It looks like something bad has happened with ordering;
>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>> not sure when I'll be able to take a look, but we should be able to
>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> it evaluate sooner...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Brian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/23/12 2:16 PM, "Gunter, David O" <dog_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I have some understanding of what is happening. In version
>>>>>>>>> 1.6,
>>>>>>>>> the check for the platform file occurs after some basic compiler
>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>> has already occured:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (dog_at_tu-fe1 61%) ./configure --with-platform=non-existant
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> == Configuring Open MPI
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ===================================================================
>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** Startup tests
>>>>>>>>> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>> checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>> checking for gcc... gcc
>>>>>>>>> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
>>>>>>>>> checking for suffix of executables...
>>>>>>>>> checking whether we are cross compiling... no
>>>>>>>>> checking for suffix of object files... o
>>>>>>>>> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
>>>>>>>>> checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
>>>>>>>>> checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
>>>>>>>>> checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
>>>>>>>>> checking for ANSI C header files... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for sys/types.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for sys/stat.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for stdlib.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for string.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for memory.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for strings.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for inttypes.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for stdint.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking for unistd.h... yes
>>>>>>>>> checking minix/config.h usability... no
>>>>>>>>> checking minix/config.h presence... no
>>>>>>>>> checking for minix/config.h... no
>>>>>>>>> checking whether it is safe to define __EXTENSIONS__... yes
>>>>>>>>> configure: error: platform file non-existant not found
>>>>>>>>> (dog_at_tu-fe1 62%)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For OMPI 1.4.5, the platform file check occurs right off:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (dog_at_tu-fe1 13%) ./configure --with-platform=non-existant
>>>>>>>>> configure: error: platform file non-existant not found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As it is in the newer release, it will fail to work for the PGI
>>>>>>>>> compilers
>>>>>>>>> then.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> David Gunter
>>>>>>>>> HPC-3: Infrastructure Team
>>>>>>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Gunter, David O wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I thought the purpose of the platform file was to be equivalent
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> setting things on the command-line to configure. Still, it has
>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>> worked that way for us.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here's what I'm seeing:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (dog_at_lo1-fe 297%) ./configure
>>>>>>>>>> --prefix=/usr/projects/hpcsoft/lobo/openmpi/1.6.0-pgi-12.4
>>>>>>>>>> --with-platform=./optimized-panasas-pgi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ==================================================================
>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>> == Configuring Open MPI
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ==================================================================
>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *** Startup tests
>>>>>>>>>> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>>> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>>> checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>>>>>>> checking for gcc...
>>>>>>>>>> /usr/projects/hpcsoft/lobo/pgi/linux86-64/12.4/bin/pgcc
>>>>>>>>>> checking whether the C compiler works... no
>>>>>>>>>> configure: error: in
>>>>>>>>>> `/usr/projects/hpctools/dog/openmpi/openmpi-1.6':
>>>>>>>>>> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>>>>>>>>>> See `config.log' for more details
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The error happens because this particular compiler, pgi-12.4,
>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>>> flags: -lnomp and -lnuma. Thus the reason for the LDFLAGS line in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> platform file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If I compile like this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (dog_at_lo1-fe 297%) ./configure
>>>>>>>>>> --prefix=/usr/projects/hpcsoft/lobo/openmpi/1.6.0-pgi-12.4
>>>>>>>>>> --with-platform=./optimized-panasas-pgi LDFLAGS="-nomp -lnuma"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then the configure proceeds normally.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> David Gunter
>>>>>>>>>> HPC-3: Infrastructure Team
>>>>>>>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send some output showing that those flags aren't passed
>>>>>>>>>>> through, like some output from "make V=1" and or from
>>>>>>>>>>> config.log?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Offhand, I don't know if we ever formally supported setting env
>>>>>>>>>>> variables other than enable and with flag variables in the
>>>>>>>>>>> platform
>>>>>>>>>>> files...?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my phone. No type good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 23, 2012, at 12:49 PM, "Gunter, David O" <dog_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to set LDFLAGS, CFLAGS, etc, in a platform file but
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.6 release does not seem to pick these up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the tail end of one of our platform files, for building
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the latest PGI compilers:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LDFLAGS="-nomp -lnuma"
>>>>>>>>>>>> CFLAGS="-I/opt/panfs/include"
>>>>>>>>>>>> CXXFLAGS="-I/opt/panfs/include"
>>>>>>>>>>>> FCFLAGS="-I/opt/panfs/include"
>>>>>>>>>>>> FFLAGS="-I/opt/panfs/include"
>>>>>>>>>>>> CCASFLAGS="-I/opt/panfs/include"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The same platform file will configure the 1.4.5 release just
>>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not work with 1.6. If I set these variables in my
>>>>>>>>>>>> environment
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> then run configure, it works just fine - as expected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone else noticed this behavior?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -david
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> David Gunter
>>>>>>>>>>>> HPC-3: Infrastructure Team
>>>>>>>>>>>> Los Alamos National Laboratory
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Brian W. Barrett
>>>>>>>> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
>>>>>>>> Sandia National Laboratories
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Brian W. Barrett
>>>>>> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
>>>>>> Sandia National Laboratories
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brian W. Barrett
>>>> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
>>>> Sandia National Laboratories
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devel mailing list
>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian W. Barrett
> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
> Sandia National Laboratories
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel_at_[hidden]
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|