On Apr 5, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> What is the state of 'mpiext' with this patch? From glancing at the
> branch it doesn't look like it has been touched.
Yeah, I've been thinking about this -- especially since you committed something relevant to mpiext the other day.
You're right -- it hasn't been touched.
How many extensions currently have fortran in them?
For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/