On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>
>> BTW, can anyone tell me why each mpool defines mca_mpool_base_resources_t instead of defining mca_mpool_blah_resources_t. The current design makes it impossible to support more than one mpool in a btl. I can delete a bunch of code if I can make a btl fall back on the rdma mpool if leave_pinned is not set.
>
> I guess you can name them as you like as long as you do the right cast to avoid compiler complaints.
>
> Why can't you support multiple mpools in the same BTL?
Because if I include mpool_rdma.h and mpool_grdma.h (or mpool_sm.h) from the same file we get a name collision since all mpool components define mca_mpool_base_resources_t.
-Nathan
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}