Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r26106
From: George Bosilca (bosilca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-09 18:05:21

On Mar 9, 2012, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote:

> BTW, can anyone tell me why each mpool defines mca_mpool_base_resources_t instead of defining mca_mpool_blah_resources_t. The current design makes it impossible to support more than one mpool in a btl. I can delete a bunch of code if I can make a btl fall back on the rdma mpool if leave_pinned is not set.

I guess you can name them as you like as long as you do the right cast to avoid compiler complaints.

Why can't you support multiple mpools in the same BTL?