On Mar 9, 2012, at 14:23 , Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> BTW, can anyone tell me why each mpool defines mca_mpool_base_resources_t instead of defining mca_mpool_blah_resources_t. The current design makes it impossible to support more than one mpool in a btl. I can delete a bunch of code if I can make a btl fall back on the rdma mpool if leave_pinned is not set.
I guess you can name them as you like as long as you do the right cast to avoid compiler complaints.
Why can't you support multiple mpools in the same BTL?