Thanks for the hint!
This issue is fixed by r26042 (CMR #3037).
On Friday 24 February 2012 05:24:26 Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
> This is consistent with my findings w/ XLC (mostly on BG/L and BG/P
> front end nodes).
> None of the 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 or 11.1 versions of XLC I tested could
> generate correct atomics.
> They either failed at build time, or failed the tests in test/asm/.
> On 2/23/2012 8:17 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > On 24/02/12 15:12, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> >> I suspect this is irrelevant, but I got a build failure trying to
> >> compile it on our BG/P front end node (login node) with the IBM XL
> >> compilers.
> > Oops, forgot how I built it..
> > export
> > PATH=/opt/ibmcmp/vac/bg/9.0/bin/:/opt/ibmcmp/vacpp/bg/9.0/bin:/opt/ibmcmp
> > /xlf/bg/11.1/bin:$PATH
> > CC=xlc CXX=xlC F77=xlf ./configure&& make
> > - --
> > Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
> > VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
> > Email: samuel_at_[hidden] Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
> > http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> > iEYEARECAAYFAk9HD1wACgkQO2KABBYQAh9EZgCcCz9x2i6KuE7/UpPzr194jHQD
> > rdcAni+dfEMhlqMzYMILn8jeS9yWlInu
> > =+rA4
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel_at_[hidden]
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel