Opps, screwed up the title. Should be: RFC: Allocate requested free list payload even if an mpool isn't specified.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> What: Allocate free list payload even if a payload size is specified even if
> no mpool is specified.
> When: Thursday, Feb 23, 2012
> Why: The current behavior is to ignore the payload size if no mpool is
> specified. I see no reason why a payload buffer should't be allocated in the
> no mpool case. Thoughts?
> Patch is attached.
> -Nathan Hjelm
> HPC-3, LANL