As an infrequent contributor, my opinion may not carry much weight, but
I offer it anyway:
I don't like the name Vader and would prefer xpmem.
However, my position on the CHANGE is best given by:
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it.
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall, though commonly misattributed to Voltaire
On 11/17/2011 8:48 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
> +1, If Nathan don't mind to change the name, then it's ok.
> Pavel (Pasha) Shamis
> Application Performance Tools Group
> Computer Science and Math Division
> Oak Ridge National Laboratory
> On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
>> On 11/17/11 6:29 AM, "Ralph Castain"<rhc_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Frankly, the only vote that counts is Nathan's - it's his btl, and we
>>> have never forcibly made someone rename their component. I would suggest
>>> we not set that precedent. I'm comfortable with whatever he decides to
>>> call it.
>> I have no objection to a rename, but agree with Ralph that this seems like
>> the sort of thing that should be handled by asking Nathan first (which
>> Jeff may have done, who knows). Naming arguments are always painful and
>> we've largely avoided them. I'd hate to start with a situation where we
>> don't talk to the original author of the code first.
>> Brian W. Barrett
>> Dept. 1423: Scalable System Software
>> Sandia National Laboratories
>> devel mailing list
> devel mailing list
Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove_at_[hidden]
Future Technologies Group
HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900