On Nov 8, 2011, at 18:32 , Ralph Castain wrote:
> That was the experience - after thrashing for quite some time, we finally found that the volatile qualifiers fixed the problem. Hence my request that people check to see if anything is broken.
I will therefore propose to forever ban all compiler guys from this time-space, as now we have the undeniable proof that they concoct an evil plan against us. Otherwise, I can't explain how MPICH never had to add volatile to these particular variables and still support all these debuggers
>> On 11/8/2011 2:46 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>>> This value is not even read by the debugger. It only check for it's existence in the startup process, so I guess we're safe here as well.
>> Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove_at_[hidden]
>> Future Technologies Group
>> HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
>> devel mailing list
> devel mailing list