Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn-full] svn:open-mpi r25445
From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-07 10:37:27


On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Nathan T. Hjelm wrote:

> Yes, and I completely agree. I was simply trying to keep it consistent in
> case there is something I don't know about the heterogeneous case.
>
> I increased the size of the 64 bit member because there is no uint128 type.

Ah, I see.

I would put the other sizes back, at a minimum. There should be no need to increase those.

George -- comments? Should this be a new key fields (128, with 2 uint64_t's)? If this is only for large messages, is the extra 8 bytes a concern?

-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/