Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: new btl descriptor flags
From: Rolf vandeVaart (rvandevaart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-29 18:23:04

This may seem trivial, but should we name them:

#define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_PUT 0x0010
#define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_GET 0x0020

Although I see there is some inconsistency in how these flags are named, two of the three original ones have "BTL_DES_FLAGS" in them.



>-----Original Message-----
>From: devel-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:devel-bounces_at_[hidden]]
>On Behalf Of Nathan Hjelm
>Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:43 PM
>To: Open MPI Developers
>Subject: [OMPI devel] RFC: new btl descriptor flags
>We need an accurate way to detect if prepare_src/prepare_dst are being
>called for a get or a put operation. I propose adding two new flags to the btl
>descriptor (and passing them from ob1/csum/etc):
>#define MCA_BTL_DES_PUT 0x0010
>#define MCA_BTL_DES_GET 0x0020
>Comments? Suggestions? Objections?
>devel mailing list
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.