Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |   all Development mailing list

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] TIPC BTL code ready for review
From: Xin He (xin.i.he_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-17 10:09:26


No there is no library that must be linked to. :-)

About the performance compared to SM, I have not tested that yet. So
far, I compared it with TCP. It has better performances under some
circumstances, not all.
Now I am working with profiling tools, hope to find reasons and improve it.

/Xin

On 08/17/2011 04:04 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> BTW, is there a libtipc that must be linked against? If so, can you give me a symbol name to check for in there?
>
> On Aug 17, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> I put it here:
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/jsquyres/ompi-tipc/overview
>>
>> You can clone that repo with the Mercurial distributed version control tool.
>>
>> I'll add a configure.m4 shortly; possibly today. You can test it for me. :-)
>>
>> For the SM stuff, perhaps TIPC should just have a higher priority than the SM BTL -- that would naturally rank it above SM. Is TIPC's same-node performance better than SM's?
>>
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Xin He wrote:
>>
>>> It is a single component.
>>>
>>> And could someone write a configure file for me?
>>>
>>> structure sockaddr_tipc (defined in tipc.h)is a good sign we have tipc.
>>>
>>> And also TIPC cannot use with SM component, because TIPC use shared memory as well for communication between processes on the same node.
>>>
>>> Please kindly check the appendix. Thank you.
>>>
>>> /Xin
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2011 03:15 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>>> Is your code self-contained in a single component?
>>>>
>>>> If it's a small (compressed) tarball, just send it to the list. Otherwise, you might want to post it somewhere like bitbucket.org where people can download and look at it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Xin He wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi developers,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have ran TIPC BTL component with the tools that recommended. After fixing some major bugs, I think the code is ready to be reviewed.
>>>>> I understand that a form has to be signed before OMPI can accept code. My organization is preparing that and soon a form will be sent.
>>>>> But in the meantime, can someone review my code please? Where should I send to?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Xin
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>
>>>
>>> *****************************************************************************
>>> ** **
>>> ** WARNING: This email contains an attachment of a very suspicious type. **
>>> ** You are urged NOT to open this attachment unless you are absolutely **
>>> ** sure it is legitimate. Opening this attachment may cause irreparable **
>>> ** damage to your computer and your files. If you have any questions **
>>> ** about the validity of this message, PLEASE SEEK HELP BEFORE OPENING IT. **
>>> ** **
>>> ** This warning was added by the IU Computer Science Dept. mail scanner. **
>>> *****************************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> <tipc.zip>_______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> devel_at_[hidden]
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquyres_at_[hidden]
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel_at_[hidden]
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>