Open MPI logo

Open MPI Development Mailing List Archives

  |   Home   |   Support   |   FAQ   |  

This web mail archive is frozen.

This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.

You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails have been added to it since July of 2016.

Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.

Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Resilient ORTE
From: George Bosilca (bosilca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-08 17:43:25


Hey if you want to push to the extreme the logic of the "computer scientist" you were talking about in my office, then return the previous callback and let the upper layer do the right thing. Suppose they don't screw up for once ...

  george.

On Jun 8, 2011, at 17:37 , Wesley Bland wrote:

> Again, you are correct. Rather than just returning the previous callback (if any) I think it makes more sense to maintain a list of callbacks and have the errmgr call them directly. That way applications/ompi layers don't have to worry about calling another callback function.
>>