Makes sense to me.
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:49 -0700, Barrett, Brian W wrote:
> Why did "we" make this change? It was originally this way, and we changed it to the no-auth way for a reason.
>
> Brian
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Squyres [mailto:jsquyres_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 09:24 AM
> To: Open Developers <devel_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: [OMPI devel] Minor OMPI SVN configuration change
>
> We have made a minor change in OMPI's SVN configuration:
>
> If you access the SVN repo over https, you *must* authenticate.
>
> Previously, you could authenticate or not; SVN would serve up what was appropriate in either case (there's one "private" tree in the SVN repo for not-yet-published academic work).
>
> Anonymous, read-only access to SVN is still provided over http.
>
> I doubt that this change will affect most people, because most people check out via https only if they plan to commit -- meaning that they have a write-enabled SVN account.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions / problems with this change.
>
--
Kenneth A. Lloyd
Director of Systems Science
Watt Systems Technologies Inc.
Albuquerque, NM USA
kenneth.lloyd_at_[hidden]
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}