You would think but I did not want to speculate what OFED might do.
I'm fine skipping the Solaris check, if OFED does include things may
have to change at that point anyway.
On 02/16/11 09:41, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> If OFED includes that constant, wouldn't we want to use it?
>
> PCI ordering is PCI ordering (i.e., unreliable) on all hardware -- or am I wrong?
>
> On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Don Kerr wrote:
>
>> I considered that but I wanted to guard against future OFED inclusion. Removing the Solaris check is easy enough.
>>
>>
>> On 02/16/11 08:49, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Don Kerr wrote:
>>>> Yes this is Solaris only. OFED has not bought back the IBV_ACCESS_SO flag. Not sure they ever will.
>>> It should be sufficient to AC_CHECK_DECLS then -- no need for the additional Solaris check.
>
>
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}