If OFED includes that constant, wouldn't we want to use it?
PCI ordering is PCI ordering (i.e., unreliable) on all hardware -- or am I wrong?
On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Don Kerr wrote:
> I considered that but I wanted to guard against future OFED inclusion. Removing the Solaris check is easy enough.
>
>
> On 02/16/11 08:49, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Don Kerr wrote:
>>> Yes this is Solaris only. OFED has not bought back the IBV_ACCESS_SO flag. Not sure they ever will.
>> It should be sufficient to AC_CHECK_DECLS then -- no need for the additional Solaris check.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|