This web mail archive is frozen.
This page is part of a frozen web archive of this mailing list.
You can still navigate around this archive, but know that no new mails
have been added to it since July of 2016.
Click here to be taken to the new web archives of this list; it includes all the mails that are in this frozen archive plus all new mails that have been sent to the list since it was migrated to the new archives.
Ya, it sounds like we should fix this eager limit help text so that others aren't misled. We did say "attempt", but that's probably a bit too subtle.
Eugene - iirc: this is in the btl base (or some other central location) because it's shared between all btls.
Sent from my PDA. No type good.
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:54 PM, "Eugene Loh" <eugene.loh_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> George Bosilca wrote:
>> Moreover, eager send can improve performance if and only if the matching receives are already posted on the peer. If not, the data will become unexpected, and there will be one additional memcpy.
> I don't think the first sentence is strictly true. There is a cost associated with eager messages, but whether there is an overall improvement or not depends on lots of factors.
> devel mailing list