On Oct 8, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I have no problem with that, but remember that it will create an ABI break for any third-party plugin developer.
> As long as we are comfortable doing that, or create the backward-compatibility we discussed, then this plan is fine by me.
Yes, we will definitely have to make sure we don't break backwards compatibility:
- MPI API
- the symbol / filename changes we did for MCA
I don't think anything else matters, right?
For corporate legal information go to: