Good catch. The patch looks ok for me.
Regards
---
Pavel Shamis (Pasha)
shamisp_at_[hidden]
On Jun 18, 2010, at 11:10 AM, nadia.derbey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reference is the v1.5 branch
>
> If an SRQ has the following settings: S,<size>,4,2,1
>
> 1) setup_qps() sets the following:
> mca_btl_openib_component.qp_infos[qp].u.srq_qp.rd_num=4
> mca_btl_openib_component.qp_infos[qp].u.srq_qp.rd_init=rd_num/4=1
>
> 2) create_srq() sets the following:
> openib_btl->qps[qp].u.srq_qp.rd_curr_num = 1 (rd_init value)
> openib_btl->qps[qp].u.srq_qp.rd_low_local = rd_curr_num - (rd_curr_num
>>> 2) = rd_curr_num = 1
>
> 3) if mca_btl_openib_post_srr() is called with rd_posted=1:
> rd_posted > rd_low_local is false
> num_post=rd_curr_num-rd_posted=0
> the loop is not executed
> wr is never initialized (remains NULL)
> wr->next: address not mapped
> ==> SIGSEGV
>
> The attached patch solves the problem by ensuring that we'll actually
> enter the loop and leave otherwise.
> Can someone have a look please: the patch solves the problem with my
> reproducer, but I'm not sure the fix covers all the situations.
>
> Regards,
> Nadia
> <001_openib_low_rd_num.patch><ATT00001..txt>
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}