On Jun 7, 2010, at 10:29 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
> How did we ended up with the following situation:
>
> -libmca_common_sm_so_version=1:0:0
> -libmca_common_mx_so_version=0:0:0
> +libmca_common_sm_so_version=2:0:0
> +libmca_common_mx_so_version=1:0:0
>
> Where the same type of component (common sm and mx here) have different version numbers?
I forget the exact issue -- at some point during the 1.3/1.4 series, we made changes to libcommon_sm.so. IIRC, the interfaces entirely changed. Hence, the first number went to 1.
Similar changes did not happen to libcommon_mx.so, so it stayed 0:0:0.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquyres_at_[hidden]
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
|
![[Flag]](../../../../../community/mirrors/flag-us.gif){kind=small}