On May 3, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> I believe the intent of the (test...) was to see if a .profile existed and execute that if so. This was at the request of users who complained that their remote environment wasn't being setup as expected when we launched their jobs. Might be a better way to do it, though...
Agreed -- am open to a better solution if someone can think of one...
For corporate legal information go to: